The chart below shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts compare the share of British students who were able to speak foreign languages additionally to English. The data are available for the years of 2000 and 2010. There is a breakdown by six different categories.
As a distinguishing quality, it can be clearly seen from the first chart that in 2000 the percentage of students who could speak Spanish was by far the biggest among all the categories, 30 percent to be exact. While only 10 % of students could speak German, the same share of students also knew two foreign languages.
As it is shown by the chart, in 2010, the situation was different, but highest percentage of students was still Spanish speakers, 35 percent precisely. Students who spoke only English were 10 percent, and French speaker students proportion was the same.
A particular feature to highlight is that in 2000 the students who spoke French and two other languages were the same, 15% each. However, after 10 years period the percentage of students who knew two foreign languages increased by 5%. Whereas, French speakers number decreased by 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... two foreign languages increased by 5%. Whereas, French speakers number decreased by 5%...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...French speakers number decreased by 5%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9781420765 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68836673279 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6428378668 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33364078059 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133784021247 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114255630508 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221244684296 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087932589533 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.