The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the finding of a poll about buying and drinking habit of coffee and tea in five major cities in Australia during the past month.
As can be seen from the chart, there was an upward trend in the number of people who went to a café stood out while other tended to fluctuate in this period.
In detail, over 60% of the polled people claimed that they interested in drinking at coffee shop, followed by a slight increase in this number in Melbourne which was also the highest one’s (63%). Otherwise, there was only over 55% a little bit pupils in Brisbane and approximately 50% in Adelaide’s citizens enjoy drinking at a shop, while this number at Hobart which was similar with Melbourne’s one. As regards people tended to love buying instant coffee whose static remain kind of the same fluctuated at 50% in Sydney and peaked at almost 55% in Hobart.
Turning to the rate of city residents are into fresh coffee tend to be low. The highest rate was nearly 45% occurred in Sydney while Melbourne took the second place as 43%. Furthermore, there was a similar rate around 34% in Brisbane and Adelaide. Finally, the proportion of Hobart was under 40% took in the third place.
In conclusion, people interesting in consuming coffee in a shop rather than at home but their jobs keep them too busy to go to there so instant one was also one of the best choices.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...%. Otherwise, there was only over 55% a little bit pupils in Brisbane and approximately 50...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, second, so, third, while, as regards, in conclusion, kind of, in the third place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60887096774 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42558002868 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2562433932 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129722091842 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579070825649 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765615429274 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908398812792 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919602386958 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.