The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart shows data about the habit of buying and drinking coffee and tea of residents from five different cities in Australia. In overall, it can be clearly seen that people mostly choose to go to a café during the four-week period.
First of all, there was roughly 65% of residents who went out to have a drink in Hobart and Melbourne, followed by just over 60% in Sydney and about 55% in Brisbane. Besides, one half of Adelaide residents grabbed drinks from coffee shops, while the proportion of people buying instant coffee there was a bit higher. In constrast with two other figures, people in Adelaide choosing fresh coffee only accounted for approximately 35%.
Secondly, the highest percentage of people using instant coffee and fresh coffee belong to Hobart and Sydney respectively. Brisbane held the lowest proportion of resident buying fresh coffee at around 34%, just a little lower than Acielauce. In addition, Sydney residents consumed less instant coffee than four other cities in last four weeks.
To sum up, most people preferred going to a
to a cafe for either coffee and tea, while Hobart and Sydney residents brought respectively instant and fresh coffee the most.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to a'.
Suggestion: to a
... To sum up, most people preferred going to a to a cafe for either coffee and tea, while H...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, secondly, while, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05025125628 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48403909815 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.935097428 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20330695838 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975688187862 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899858788092 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119685030983 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718406100614 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.