The column chart demonstrates the proportion of tea and coffee buying and consumption habits of five different city residents of Australia in the last 4 weeks.
Overall, it can be seen that peoples of four different cities preferred to go to café to have coffee or tea throughout the given time frame except for Adelaide. Also, it is evident that Hobart people love to go to café mostly while residents of Brisbane reluctant to buy fresh coffee for them in the last four weeks.
In Sydney, the percentage of city residents who went to a café was 61, while it was 64 in Melbourne, which was also the highest proportion among the five different given cities. Fifty-five percent of Brisbane’s residents choose a café shop to drink coffee or tea while it dropped down to 50% in Adelaide, which was the least consumption percentage in comparison with all the other given residents of Australia. Finally, it is clear that the same proportion of Hobart residents loves to go to a coffee shop in Melbourne.
There was a contrasting trend for buying fresh or instant coffee among the residents of Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane in the last four weeks. In Sydney, 45% of city residents bought instant coffee for consumption while it was slightly higher for Melbourne residents. But, 10% more people prone to buy instant coffee in comparison with the above two cities in Australia. However, the least number of people in Brisbane reluctant to buy fresh coffee, while around 44% of people in Sydney love to consume fresh coffee in the last four weeks. Besides, a greater number of people of Hobart city preferred to buy instant coffee than the residents of Brisbane as well as Adelaide. Similarly, the proportion of residents who bought fresh coffee was higher for Hobart city residents while it was 34% for both the residents of Brisbane and Adelaide in Australia.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88643533123 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65461489985 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388012618297 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4331074533 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16351171809 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088395847512 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05258598257 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134297698024 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491032425741 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.