The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and te buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities . Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart present information about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Overall, it can be inferred that, almost all cities people was prefered went to a cafe for to drink coffe or tea in last 4 weeks, rather than to buy and such figure was the most high sharply.
We will start from Sydney city. This cities people bought fresh coffee 43% while instant coffee indicators showed 46% in last 4 weeks. Secondly, Melbourne's performance is almost the same as Sydney's. Moreover, Brisbane and Adelaide people bought fresh coffee over 30%. In Hobart was popular instant coffe almost 55%, compared to fresh coffee. In comparison with Melbourne and Hobart cities people the most high result showed respectively, by went to a cafe for coffee or tea last 4 weeks. In addition, the lower graph below to Brisbane and Adelaide people whilst their habitants bought the smaller percent 37% fresh coffee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such figure was the most high sharply. We will start from Sydney city. This cit...
^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...lmost 55%, compared to fresh coffee. In comparison with Melbourne and Hobart cities people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a cafe for coffee or tea last 4 weeks. In addition, the lower graph below to Bris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94904458599 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36395848698 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6026015276 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248919319039 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102281939627 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112362819768 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203254440464 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435981887786 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.