The bar chart compares the coffee and tea purchasing and drinking habits of the people who live in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart.
Overall, people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea in the last 4 weeks accounted for the largest proportion in four cities except for Adelaide. By contrast, the percentage of people who bought fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks was the smallest in all cities.
In Melbourne, Hobart, and Sydney, over 60% of people went to a cafe in the last 4 weeks, followed by Brisbane and Adelaide at about 56% and 49% respectively. In addition, Hobart had the highest proportion of people who bought instant coffee in the last 4 weeks at approximately 54%, followed by Brisbane, Adelaide, Melbourne, and Sydney at about 53%, 50%, 48%, and 46%, respectively. Adelaide was the only city where more people bought instant coffee than fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks.
The proportion of people who bought fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks was highest in Sydney at nearly 44%, followed by Melbourne and Hobart at about 43% and 37% respectively. Brisbane and Adelaide had approximately the same percentage at just below 35%.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86432160804 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72394257186 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427135678392 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.468922461 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151396252638 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848814769955 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472176255881 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114268335877 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402344893727 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.