The line chart compares Australia, Canada, and European Community in terms of their wheat exports between 1985 and 1990. Units are measured in millions of tons.
Overall, the wheat exports of the European Community experienced an upward trend over the 5-year period. By contrast, Australia saw a downward trend and Canada fluctuated in terms of their wheat exports.
As the graph shows, the wheat export figure of the European Community started at approximately 17 million tons in 1985, followed by a moderate decrease to about 14 million tons in 1986. Then, it climbed to exactly 15 million tons and remained stable between 1987 and 1988, before witnessing a steady growth to 19 and 21 million tons in 1989 and 1990, respectively. Regarding Canada’s export, they shipped approximately 19 million tons of wheat in 1985, followed by a slight decrease to around 17 million tons in 1986. Afterward, the figure experienced considerable growth to 25 million tons in 1988, but then plunged to below 15 million tons in 1989. It subsequently rose to just under 20 million tons in 1990.
By contrast, the number of wheat exported by Australia began at 15 million tons in 1985, followed by a slight increase to about 16 million tons in 1986. Then, the figure witnessed a steady decrease to just above 10 million tons between 1987 and 1990.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98660714286 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67928189982 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1728385937 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.545454545 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714820170549 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365271868151 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320211622291 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560401210457 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204667147345 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.