The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010

The maps give information about the transport facilities near a city hospital in 2007 and the changes that happened in 2010.

Overall, by 2010, the transport facilities near the hospital had experienced significant improvement, including a new bus station, two roundabouts, and larger staff and public car parks.

In 2007, there was a ring road surrounding the city hospital with an entrance to the car park to its southeast, which was for staff and public. City Road was located to the south of the hospital, connecting with the ring road by Hospital Road. There were three bus stops sited on both sides of Hospital Road.

In 2010, the intersection of Ring Road and Hospital Road was replaced by a roundabout, while a similar one was also constructed on the intersection of Hospital Road and City Road. The six bus stops were demolished to make room for a new bus station on the east side of Hospital Road and a staff-only car park on the west side. There were two small roads connecting the bus station to the roundabouts. In addition, a new car park for the public was constructed to the west of the city hospital, next to Ring Road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...road by Hospital Road. There were three bus stops sited on both sides of Hospital R...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74610633443 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4145188433 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337215314786 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165974760035 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076474222465 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224722438718 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063701763022 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.