Exchanging information is an indispensable part of scientific research, business, and academic world. Some people argue that information should be shared as much as possible in these activities, while others consider that some information should be kept secret due to its value and importance.
There are good arguments for sharing information. In scientific research, knowing the previous work done by other researchers is one of the most important procedures, which is called literature reviewing. During this process, information is exchanged by reading formal publications or talking to field experts. As a result, scientists could avoid unnecessary effort to rebuild the wheels, so they could concentrate on their own objectives. Without sufficient information sharing, scientists would fail to obtain the necessary knowledge that lays the foundation for their research. Regarding business, sharing information between different departments of a company makes cooperation more efficient. This means that various groups of people can work together to pursue a common goal at the same time, which would possibly lead to an increase in the company's revenue.
However, some information ought to be kept confidential for several reasons. For example, scientists should protect their own intellectual properties before they decide to make their work public, or otherwise, they have to face the problem of stealing ideas. In addition, some information like customer data is a strategic resource of a company. Sharing this information with other companies, especially the competitors, would result in disastrous business failures. Similarly, information related to national security should not be shared with any foreign bodies at all.
To conclude, my own view is that while certain types of information sharing can boost productivity in the business and academic world, not all information should be shared as much as possible. Some critical information ought to be kept confidential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73310810811 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08933630623 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7624535847 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36630128536 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1247911682 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846438744542 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263418131412 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856699530401 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.