The line chart compares Australia, Canada, and European Community in terms of their wheat exports between 1985 and 1990. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
Overall, the wheat exports of European Community experienced an upward trend over the 5-year period. By contrast, Australia saw a downward trend and Canada fluctuated in terms of their wheat exports.
Starting at approximately 17 millions of tonnes in 1985, the number of wheat exported by European Community declined to below 15 millions of tonnes in 1986 and remained stable between 1987 and 1988. After that, there was a rapid grow between 1989 and 1990, standing at just above 20 millions of tonnes in 1990. By contrast, the number of wheat exported by Australia began at 15 million of tonnes in 1985, followed by a slight increase to about 16 millions of tonnes in 1986 and a steady decrease to just above 10 millions of tonnes between 1987 and 1990.
Regarding Canada, it exported approximately 19 millions of tonnes of wheat in 1985, followed by a slight decrease to about 17 millions of tonnes in 1986. It witnessed a sharp increase to 25 millions of tonnes between 1987 and 1988, followed by a rapid drop to below 15 millions of tonnes in 1989. Finally, the Canadian wheat exports climbed to just below 20 millions of tonnes in 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...t exports. Starting at approximately 17 millions of tonnes in 1985, the number of wheat exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...by European Community declined to below 15 millions of tonnes in 1986 and remained stable betw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...n 1989 and 1990, standing at just above 20 millions of tonnes in 1990. By contrast, the number...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '16 million'.
Suggestion: 16 million
... followed by a slight increase to about 16 millions of tonnes in 1986 and a steady decrease to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
...986 and a steady decrease to just above 10 millions of tonnes between 1987 and 1990. Regard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '19 million'.
Suggestion: 19 million
...rding Canada, it exported approximately 19 millions of tonnes of wheat in 1985, followed by a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
... followed by a slight decrease to about 17 millions of tonnes in 1986. It witnessed a sharp in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '25 million'.
Suggestion: 25 million
... 1986. It witnessed a sharp increase to 25 millions of tonnes between 1987 and 1988, followed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...1988, followed by a rapid drop to below 15 millions of tonnes in 1989. Finally, the Canadian w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...ian wheat exports climbed to just below 20 millions of tonnes in 1990.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57811630332 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410714285714 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8929868016 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958369299054 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056098568214 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433237005223 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730084966282 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201897738949 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.