The line chart compares Australia, Canada, and the European Community in terms of their wheat exports between 1985 and 1990. Units are measured in millions of tons.
Overall, the wheat exports of the European Community experienced an upward trend over the 5-year period. By contrast, Australia saw a downward trend and Canada fluctuated in terms of their wheat exports.
Starting at approximately 17 million tons in 1985, the number of wheat exported by European Community declined to below 15 million tons in 1986 and remained stable between 1987 and 1988. After that, there was a rapid grow between 1989 and 1990, standing at just above 20 million tons in 1990. By contrast, the number of wheat exported by Australia began at 15 million tons in 1985, followed by a slight increase to about 16 million tons in 1986 and a steady decrease to just above 10 million tons between 1987 and 1990.
Regarding Canada, it exported approximately 19 million tons of wheat in 1985, followed by a slight decrease to about 17 million tons in 1986. It witnessed a sharp increase to 25 million tons between 1987 and 1988, followed by a rapid drop to below 15 million tons in 1989. Finally, the Canadian wheat exports climbed to just below 20 million tons in 1990.
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85581395349 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49798187879 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427906976744 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9964998775 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958369299054 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056098568214 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433237005223 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730084966282 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201897738949 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.