The pie charts compare the proportion of water used for three different purposes (industrial, agricultural, and domestic) in six different regions in the world.
Overall, agricultural-used water accounted for the largest proportion in Africa, Central Asia, South East Asia, and South America, while the main purpose of water usage in North America and Europe was for industrial use.
As the graph shows, the proportion of industrial use water was the largest in Europe, standing at 53%, followed by North America at 48%. Regarding the other four regions, the figure for industrial use of water was below 15%. This figure for South East Asia was 12%, followed by South America, Africa, and Central Asia, standing at 10%, 7%, and 5% respectively.
By contrast, the percentage of agricultural use of water ranked first in Central Asia at 88%, followed by Africa, South East Asia, South America, standing at 84%, 81%, and 71% respectively. In addition, this figure for North America and Europe was relatively small, accounting for 39% and 32% of the total water usage. Moreover, the domestic use of the water accounted for the smallest proportion in all regions except South America. This figure for South America was 19%, followed by Europe, North America, Africa, standing at 15%, 13%, and 9%, respectively. The proportion of domestic use of water was the same in Central Asia and South East Asia at 7%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12608695652 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72806945457 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404347826087 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7660934323 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253637769036 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139264549942 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113210702029 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225261313047 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123902181276 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.