The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

The given pie charts illustrates the conclusion of a survey regarding different types of visitors in the UK in 1999.
It can be clearly seen that, theme parks were the popular area among the many tourism place whereas Wildlife Parks and Zoos had the lowest number of national and international tourist in 1999.
As a matter of fact, in 1999 Theme park holds the largest proportion of tourist (at 38%) in London whereas Museums and Galleries have the slight less visitors in same year. Similarly, there was only 9% of average tourist who have visited the Wildlife Parks and Zoos which is almost half than the average proportion of tourist who have visited the Historic Houses and Monuments in the question.
On the other hand, Blackpool Pleasure Beach was the popular area for most of the tourist among the various mention categories whilst Alton Towers holds slightly more tourist than that of Pleasureland, Southport; 17% and 16% respectively. Lastly, the likeliness among the tourist for visiting Legoland, Wndsor and Chessington World of Adventure both holds the equal number of tourist in the same period in the question.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tourism seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much tourism', 'a good deal of tourism'.
Suggestion: much tourism; a good deal of tourism
...e parks were the popular area among the many tourism place whereas Wildlife Parks and Zoos h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun visitors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s Museums and Galleries have the slight less visitors in same year. Similarly, there...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, as a matter of fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03743315508 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57195347261 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6971862313 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1666666667 5.23603664747 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206499112415 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103568367823 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04739214708 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122056530682 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523513424774 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.