The bar chart illustrates the total number of minutes by local fixed line, national and international fixed line and mobile telephone calls in UK during 1995 to 2002.
Overall, it is clear that local fixed line remained the highest used telephone category,while, mobile phone usage witnessed a considerable growth.
Moving on to the details, initially in 1995, about 71 billion minutes were done by local and fixed line, which then continued to increase in the following years until 1990 and reached to the highest of 90 billion minutes. Thereafter, the figure showed a decrease by each year and ended at the initial rate of 71 billion. In contrast, mobile calls was the least in starting year at 1billion minutes, and rose considerably in the consecutive years and it reached at 45 billion in 2002.
Similarly, national and international fixed line also exhibited an upward trend throughout the time period. 48 billion in 1995 exhibited a steady rise and reached to the maximum of 60 billion in the end year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ined the highest used telephone category,while, mobile phone usage witnessed a conside...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rting year at 1billion minutes, and rose considerably in the consecutive years an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02958579882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77425831996 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7338505977 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214788587401 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993255597756 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863443754887 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131824942914 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985805016891 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.