The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart below gives information on the amount of time, expressed in billions of minutes, spent by British on telephone calls, in the years between 1995 and 2002. The calls are divided into three groups depending on their typology.
Overall, the amount of time used in calls has been growing significantly during this period. In particular, the trend of mobile calls has increased steadily, and local and national/international fixed lines fluctuated and grew slightly, respectively.
The local fixed lines had a peak of usage in 1999 when they reached the highest value in the chart with approximately 90 billions minutes. However, during the following 3 years this number went down to 70 billions, the same amount it had in 1995. On the other side, the usage of National and International fixed line had a gradual and constant grow until the last year reported, when it counted just over 60 billions minutes.
The usage of mobiles, which were very uncommon in 1995, with approximately 3 billions minutes of usage, has experienced a steady increase over the years, up to just above 45 billions minutes, fifteen times the starting value.
[Original source: https://essaytoolbox.com/grade-my-paper]
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee groups depending on their typology. Overall, the amount of time used in cal...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uated and grew slightly, respectively. The local fixed lines had a peak of usa...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counted just over 60 billions minutes. The usage of mobiles, which were very u...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31770833333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.85106505267 2.65546596893 145% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1190470148 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163538135241 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683885064716 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626550765871 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883474364949 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918260179867 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.