The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002
The bar chart gives information about the total amount of minutes that people in the UK spend on telephone calls categorized into three types, between 1995-2002.
It is clearly seen that the local fixed line holds the highest time-using position over the period. Meanwhile, the mobile call has the lowest number of time used.
The figure for the local calls shows a fluctuation over 7 year period. In 1995, it was about 71 billion minutes and rose steadily to 90 billion in 1999, and then decreased significantly to more than 71 billion in 2002. However, it is true that the local- fixed line was the most phone call made among other lines.
In contrast, the quantity of national and international calls in the UK rise gradually from about 35 billion in 1995 to about 60 billion in 2002, approximately two times higher than in 1995. The mobile call has the same trend, it grew from just about 1 billion minutes in the first year to more than 40 billion in 2002.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65497076023 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43602175209 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3451222102 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38280776103 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15056291507 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112662702342 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219843593295 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117346265879 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65497076023 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43602175209 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3451222102 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38280776103 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15056291507 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112662702342 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219843593295 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117346265879 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.