The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
The bar graph illustrates the number of minutes used telephone calls in three primary categories namely local – fixed line, national and international – fixed line, and mobiles in Britain over a period of 7 years between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, it is clear that most people used local - fixed line among the three surveyed; however, the figure decreased over the time shown while the other two significantly increased. Units are measured in billion minutes.
In 1995, the number of minutes used by local – fixed line was at approximately 70 billion minutes, nearly 2 times higher than that of national and international – fixed line. Then, the former saw a gradual rise of around 20 billion minutes in the next 3 years before tumbling to the same amount as at the beginning in 2002. However, the later witnessed a dramatic increase to over 60 billion minutes over the period surveyed.
Meanwhile, the total of minutes of mobiles (all calls) was merely below 5 million minutes in 1995 and it remained below 10 million minutes until 1998. After that, the figure rose significantly to nearly 45 billion minutes in the end.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 94
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- Topic: Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...cantly increased. Units are measured in billion minutes. In 1995, the number of minu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95287958115 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57988681384 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6070465633 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25323465818 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108291573401 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626163889676 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155561249774 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671968325828 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.