The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph provides information about the sum of three different phone call duration in the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2002. Overall, there was a significant increase of the duration of the total call on national and international and cellular during the reported years while, the local –fixed call in 1999 was observed as the highest figure on UK’s total call.
The local – fixed call was reported as the highest figure among the other types of call. In first years, it stood at about 73 million. Then, in the three following years, the number increased about 5 million each year and reach the peak figure in 1999 (90 million). Following which, it saw a moderate change and reach just below 80 million in the last year.
In 1995, the figure for the national and international call was half that of the local call. Then, it experienced a small increase (around 4 million a year) from 1996 to 2001 and finished the period at approximately 65 million in 2002. Furthermore, the figure for the mobile call was the lowest among the other two. it stood just below 5 million in 1995 and accounted for just about 48 million in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...all was the lowest among the other two. it stood just below 5 million in 1995 and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46462978964 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0250918666 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159323526507 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699743671691 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444278412983 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122597105851 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469573849085 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.