The given data illustrates the export earnings of a country for the period 2015 -2016 among various products. Along with it the table represent the percentage change of these products for the same period.
Firstly, it can be witnessed that petroleum and agriculture products have almost same numbers for both the years that is $60 and $30 billions respectively. In case of gems section revenue for 2016 is approximately $40 billions which is less in contrast with the previous year. Textiles along with the engineered goods shown around the increase of $10 billions, crossing $30 and $60 billions mark.
Secondly, in terms of percentage the minimum rise can be seen in the export of agricultural products which is 0.81%. Petroleum products have a improvement of 3% and engineered goods 8.5%. The highest improvement can be seen in textiles with the rise of 15.24%. However, gems and jewellery had performed worst among all categories with the decline of 5.18%.
Overall, petroleum and engineered goods have a highest market share in both the years. Whereas, agricultural products and textiles market share is similar in the year 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...which is 0.81%. Petroleum products have a improvement of 3% and engineered goods ...
^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ll, petroleum and engineered goods have a highest market share in both the years....
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, well, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11891891892 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81257740742 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5421551838 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153562736105 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605520896277 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627588864819 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100175943401 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783365462903 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.