There is a continuous debate about recent restrictions in US, where youngsters have to be accompanied by parents during late hours. To some extent this a good initiative for the well being of society, however there are certain flaws too which will be discussed in this essay.
First of all, restrictions should be imposed in the areas with the high crime rate. Due to the fact that teenagers don't know how to protect themselves, this could make them most favorable victims. Hence, such steps are good for their safety. Even, people of these age groups are highly curious. They could also involve in these unlawful activities. Moreover, this may further attract their pears that would risk the future of the country.
However, certain section of the society says that every-time they could not accompany their children's. They believe hefty amounts are given by them in the form of taxes. Hence, providing the social security has to be ensured by the authorities. Not only this, some also consider it to be against their constitutional right that is freedom. But these people are are oblivious to the fact that change begins at home. Hence, they must support the government in all the forms to make their society livable.
In conclusion, especially in dangerous areas teenagers must be accompanied by the adults or restricted to move out during night. However, ages over 16 could be exempted. What is more important thing is to educate the people including parents, else situation would not change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...me rate. Due to the fact that teenagers dont know how to protect themselves, this c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers dont know how to protect themselves, this could make them most favorable vict...
^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...right that is freedom. But these people are are oblivious to the fact that change begin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, moreover, so, well, as to, in conclusion, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.032 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55957496472 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9656088919 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225299638499 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610414294222 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525352053229 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134867797636 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034767046214 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.