The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart compares five groups of exporting earnings in one country in 2015 and 2016, and the table demonstrates changes in percentage over the one-year period.
It is clear that the revenues of the products increased for four out of five categories, and petroleum products contributed to the biggest incomes in both 2015 and 2016. We can see that even though earnings from textiles kept in small numbers compared to those from others, it grew faster than that of any others.
According to the bar chart, the amount of money coming from petroleum products rose from 60 billion in 2015 to about 62 billion dollars in 2016, ranked as the most popular exporting goods. Similarity, earnings from engineered goods, agricultural products and textiles showed an increasing trend, from 58 to 60, 31 to 32, and 25 to 33 billion dollars respectively over 2015 to 2016. Gems and jewellery, by contrast, became less popular over the period from 2015 to 2016, with a fall from 43 to 41 billion dollars.
Looking at the percentage change in the table, the textiles industry saw the most significant fluctuation, demonstrating an increase of 15.24% compared the sales from 2015 and 2016. The changes for turnover in the percentage of engineered goods and gems and jewellery were both over 5%, 8.5% more for the former and 5.18% less for the later. Products from petroleum and agriculture contributed stably to around 32 billion dollars in the incomes from overseas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...the percentage change in the table, the textiles industry saw the most significant fluct...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00819672131 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68374725489 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.4585817705 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.777777778 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240794054337 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115911005235 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106825780825 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183260374103 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119534329765 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.