The bar chart provides information regarding the export earnings of some commodities in a country in two different years (2015 and 2016), with the figures of changing value’s percentages being shown in a table.
As regards the first, the revenue of the country increased in the year 2016 in contrast with 2015 in four commodities except for gems and jewelry that dropped (5.18%). Furthermore, the highest rate of increment was for the textiles that rocketed to 15.24%, followed by engineered goods in 8.5%. It is worth noting that the vast majority of earning was for petroleum products (about 62 and 65 billion) and for engineered goods (approximately 57 and 63 billion) in the year 2015 and 2016 respectively. Finally, the profits of agricultural products with textiles were comparable in the year 2016, and they had the lowest profit for the country, and the minimum export earning contributed to the textiles (26 billion) in the year 2015.
To sum up, by comparing the marks of table and the bar charts pattern, it is obvious that the export earnings of majority of products rose in the year 2016, and the enormous profits were for petroleum products and engineered foods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, as for, as regards, except for, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97461928934 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7240775163 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.303931875 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.333333333 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.8333333333 5.23603664747 341% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22546278126 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125364393544 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087788299934 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185961876018 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733602954171 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.