The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart and data table illustrate the trends in export earnings with respect to different product categories by the percentage proportion and the number of billions between 2015 and 2016.
Looking from the overall perspective, the most dramatical changes occurred in the textiles and engineered goods, making up to 24% in increase. The largest share of export earnings accounted for the export of petroleum products and engineered products, rising slightly from almost 60 to 65 billion USD by the end of surveyed period in both categories.
Turning to the detailed investigation of the graph, the agricultural products and textiles have approximately equal export earning in 2016, hovering around 42 billion dollars. As opposed to the export in 2015, where the textile earnings were quite lower 40 billion, whereas agricultural export income was kept on balance for two years. Gems and jewellery appeared not to follow the similar pattern of other product categories, marginally decreasing the amount of export entry from 52 to 50 billion USD.
Given data of percentage values in export earnings shows us a 5% decline in the gems and jewellery export earnings, what is five times more than the increase in earnings from agriculture. Moving to the petroleum export values, we notice that the earnings in 2016 have surged just in 3% relating to 2015 values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with the projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The chart below shows the total minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into 3 categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show information about weekly hours in Australia in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed just in 3% relating to 2015 values.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, well, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21266968326 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75779883853 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.0453330752 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247552679257 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112973962357 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778550637319 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16873038416 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828834694133 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.