The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The presented chart illustrates the information about work of people from the same university, who got degree after undergraduate Anthropology courses. At that time, the table gives what volume of salaries graduates got during period of time how they had been working for 5 year.
Overall, although the majority of graduates have full-time work, there are unemployed people too, while most anthropologists earn significant amount of money in any sort of occupation.
Regarding pie chart, we can see that more than half of graduates have full-time work and full- time work with postgrad study (52 % and 8 %). Further, fifteen percent of people work part-timely plus five percent of people have in additional postgraduate study apart from work. Besides, persentage of unemployed people and those who do not provide information equal twenty percent.
It is observed from the table that anthropologists from government sectors have amount of income more than other, there are fifty percent of people who earn more than 100.000 dollars. In contrast freelance consultants, where eighty percent of people have salaries from 75.000 dollars and higher, people who work in private companies have minor income. There are 45 percent of anthropologists, who have from 25.000 dollars to 75.000 dollars, and 55 percent of people, who earn more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...volume of salaries graduates got during period of time how they had been working for 5 year. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'amounted'.
Suggestion: amounted
...opologists from government sectors have amount of income more than other, there are fi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
...income more than other, there are fifty percent of people who earn more than 100.000 do...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... who earn more than 100.000 dollars. In contrast freelance consultants, where eighty per...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'percents'?
Suggestion: percents
...mpanies have minor income. There are 45 percent of anthropologists, who have from 25.00...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, so, while, apart from, in addition, in contrast, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35885167464 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85884539852 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607655502392 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7887907509 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175186633298 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845899635469 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638257433587 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123127374292 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827769221039 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.