The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the choices of Anthropology students after accomplishing their undergraduate degrees, whereas the table provides data regarding the wages of five-year experienced anthropologists.
Overall, most graduates are prone to pursue full-time work after they finish school. Moreover, government sector positions are seen to have the highest income opportunities.
In terms of the pie chart, it is noticeable that a vast majority of anthropology graduates acquire a full-time job after their graduation, with 52% exactly, making it the most common preference for students. The following most popular option is applying for a part-time job, with 15% of graduates confirmed being part-time workers. There is a similar proportion of 8% of full-time post-grad learners compared with those who work and study simultaneously. Lastly, the remaining 12% belongs to the unemployed.
With reference to the table, private company employees have the slowest promotion rate after the five-year period, with only 30% reported to obtain an income of $100000. On the other hand, freelance consultants and governmental officers are reported to receive higher opportunities, with 40% and 50% of graduates reaching the maximum salary level respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'reported obtaining'.
Suggestion: reported obtaining
...ter the five-year period, with only 30% reported to obtain an income of 00000. On the other hand, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, moreover, regarding, whereas, with reference to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20602974641 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664864864865 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8374324778 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206061511904 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775994534461 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705552462488 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130420229137 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497562381078 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.