The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The table and pie charts illustrate the police funding of a particular zone n Britain from 2017 to 2018. While the table reveals the sources of the money, the pie charts give insights into the budget provision.
Overall, the total police funding obtained an increase during a one-year period, whereas the budget distribution witnessed minor changes.
Regarding the table, it is notable that the national government was the main contributor to the police budget, giving a significant amount of money to the police in both years. To be more specific, law enforcement agencies received 175.5 million Euros from the national authority in 2017, with this number being slightly raised to 177.8 million in the following year. Moreover, local taxes were also in charge of a huge sum of the police budget, which simultaneously acquired a noticeable increase during the time surveyed. Particularly, local taxes donated 91.2 million Euros to police departments in 2017. This number later experienced a significant raise of 11.1 million in the subsequent year to reach 102.3 million. Other sources were the most trivial contributor, with money channeled to police officers being exactly 38 and 38.5 million respectively.
In terms of the use of resources, buildings and transport accounted for 17% of the total amount in both years, with exactly 17%. In addition, a small proportion of 6% was relocated from the salary sector to technological purposes, with figures of both aforementioned groups taking up 69% and 14% of the police budget in the year 2018.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22489959839 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82895739657 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8801946894 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.272727273 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25199147106 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101683987979 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934499684235 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165688732202 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116070192782 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.