The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of water being distributed to six regions around the world for numerous intentions.
Overall, while a large amount of water is allocated for agriculture use, the other two purposes, namely domestic and industrial, receive relatively trivial capacity of water.
Looking at the charts, apart from North America and Europe, all other regions witness a massive amount of water being channeled into agricultural activities, with figures ranging from 71% to 88%. In detail, agriculture notably takes up a significant water proportion of 88% in Central Asia, which synonymously spares only 12% for the other two sectors. Moreover, Africa and Southeast Asia experience a common trend, with agriculture use overtaking 84% and 81% respectively the total amount of water provided for the regions. However, North America and Europe splinter most of their water reserve for industrial activities, whereas agriculture only occupies the second place regarding water consumption. Lastly, domestic use appears to receive insignificant shares of regional water, with figures being beneath 20% in all six areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67251461988 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86773990279 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.388019809 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152805651554 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826762184864 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426909882284 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126002932562 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302214988596 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.06136585366 131% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.