Some People claims that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
Nowadays, there have been heated controversies over the recycling of household waste. Some people argue that the amount of garbage recycled is still insufficient and believe in the necessity to have laws enacted by governments to solve the situation. From my perspective, I completely concur with the given statement for some reasons that are going to be discussed in the essay.
First and foremost, it is indisputable that people’s attitudes towards the worsening condition of the environment are threatening. To be more specific, many individuals are still not aware of the detrimental effects that non-biodegradable waste has on the environment, which eventually leads to the increasing number of plastic bottles and bags being sent to landfills and the oceans, directly causing climate change and global warming. This pressing issue raises public concerns over the world’s sustainability and capability to confront serious environmental problems as well as keep it a clean planet for younger generations. Therefore, it is understandable for many citizens to urge governments to pass laws and policies in terms of recycling household waste.
To say that, if recycling is made compulsory and civil responsibility, radical changes will occur in people’s daily lives as a result of a mental shift about the importance of saving our planet. More and more waste will be recycled, and plastic bags and bottles will be replaced by paper-made commodities, which supports the governments in curbing the seriousness of pollution. In addition, by publishing legal requirements regarding waste recycling, officials and people around the world can unitedly contribute to the global efforts and show their commitment to protecting the environment.
In conclusion, the concept of making recycling imperative for the public should be encouraged and pushed forward by governments, since the benefits it produces are significantly apparent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62457337884 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25335288597 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61433447099 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0640498581 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.818181818 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254513672973 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857766076676 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426457207241 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143173992716 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336543754185 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.