The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007.
The bar graph reveals what percentage of UK adults were endulged in six various sorts of professional commitments in the year 2007.
A quick glance at column chart is quite enough to make it clear that the majority of males were conceded construction as their first priority. However, females were much fascinating towards teaching.
In the analisation of masculine executives, in UK, construction had became top preference with spectacular proportion (90%). scientists and low were stood at second and third rank through the approach of three fifths and just over the half of the whole working realm. Journalism and advertising were exact half and more than two fifths respectively. Surprisingly, both therapists and teaching were under one in five.
In comparison, with masculine labours, in case of uk feminine, teaching and therapists were maximum with singnificant percentum which was 90 and 80 consecutively. Advertising and journalisim were two catagories that contributed analogous ammount (50%) in working placements. Law, scientists and construction were less than half of the entire professional rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ine executives, in UK, construction had became top preference with spectacular proport...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
...erence with spectacular proportion 90%. scientists and low were stood at second and third ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and teaching were under one in five. In comparison, with masculine labours, i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k feminine, teaching and therapists were maximum with singnificant percentum whic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57647058824 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17016803938 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664705882353 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2930022016 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948857598439 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364063778739 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493781277701 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073175679912 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592642728055 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.