The chart illustrates the percentage of people( men, women, and children) who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The chart illustrates the percentage of people( men, women, and children) who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, it is evident from the chart that the percentage of women who ate the fruit and vegetable items was highest while the percentage of children eating the food items was lowest. Furthermore, a graph shows a significant rise in the proportion of people eating these food items in the given period.
The percentage of women who ate fruits and vegetables started at just about 21% in 2001. Then it rose gradually and reached a peak of about 35% in 2006 before falling slightly to 30% in 2008.
In terms of men and children, the proportion of people who used the food items remained steady for the first three consecutive years( about 17% and 12% respectively). From this point, the percentage of men grew and reached a peak of about 28% in both 2006 and 2007 and then dipped slightly to about 27% in 2008. For the children, a similar climb was visible reaching about 26% in 2007 and then dropped slightly to about 25% in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...n who ate the fruit and vegetable items was highest while the percentage of children eating...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48875974118 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8494327338 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468479078223 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232211173459 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.301623257118 0.0843802449381 357% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382665871457 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.357165586514 0.0819641961636 436% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.