The chart illustrates the number of hours spent each week by teenagers in Chester on seven different activities from 2002 to 2007.
The chart illustrates the number of hours spent each week by teenagers in Chester on seven different activities from 2002 to 2007.
Overall, it is evident that the teenagers of Chester spent most of their time watching TV during the given period. On the other hand, they spent the least amount of time on bowling.
Over the given period, the number of hours spent by teenagers going to pubs, watching Television and shopping had experienced growth. In 2002, the teenagers spent about 5 hours per week going to pubs, which rose to about 18 hours in 2007. Watching TV accounted for 25 hours per week in 2002, climbing to 38 hours per week in 2007. The number of hours spent on shopping almost doubled from about 70 hours in 2002 to 15 hours in 2007.
On the other hand, the number of hours teenagers spent on doing homework and sports had experienced a decline over these years. The time spent doing homework decreased from approximately 12 hours per week in 2002 to 7 hours per week in 2007. Sports activities accounted for 10 hours per week in 2002, which showed a dramatic fall to about 2 hours in 2007.
Additionally, the hours per week that teenagers of Chester spent on watching DVDs and bowling experienced fluctuations during 2002-2007. The time spent on watching DVDs was just above 10 hours per week in 2002, then it increased and reached a peak of about 18 hours per week in 2004, declining afterward and accounting for about 10 hours in 2007. The time spent on bowling per week fell from about 4 hours in 2002 to about 2 hours in 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63309352518 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42060406749 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.359712230216 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4784862795 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0769230769 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540695571486 0.215688989381 251% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275941278055 0.103423049105 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222964565649 0.0843802449381 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42867748781 0.15604864568 275% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.298997598415 0.0819641961636 365% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.