The chart show percentage of female and male teachers in 6 different types of educational setting in UK in 2010
The bar chart compares the the proportion of female and male teachers in different educational levels in UK in the year of 2010.
Overall, the rate of female who were teachers topped the list in all types of educational setting, except in university while the percentage of men who were university teachers was among the least in the finding provided.
Look at the bar chart for more detail, we can see that the rate of female teachers in Nursery/Pre-school hold the lion’s share, at 92% -97%, which was over 85% higher than that of men. Nevertheless, there was a relatively similar trend observed in the percentage of female teachers in Secondary school, College, and Private training institute, at 55%, 50%, and 45%, respectively. This trend was also seen in the rate of female teachers in the same types of educational levels.
The striking feature was the proportion of male teachers in university. It took the lead at 65%, which was 35% higher than that of women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The bar chart compares the the proportion of female and male teachers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The bar chart compares the the proportion of female and male teachers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more detail, we can see that the rate of female teachers in Nursery/Pre-school ho...
^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... This trend was also seen in the rate of female teachers in the same types of edu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93373493976 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86990506094 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9527655961 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338857979102 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167710810504 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139272666115 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228202942826 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149305767174 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.