Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
In recent decades, the question whether the proliferation of technology has good impacts on communication or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend results in many negative effects, their benefits still overshadow.
There are a whole host of bad and good effects technology makes to social relationships. First, due to the state-of-the-art technology, individuals are likely to connect to other people without any physical travel. It means thanks to top-notch applications, such as Viber, Skype, people can have more regular conversations to their colleagues and friends in foreign countries, which can save their time and effort. Second, with the eye-catchy sound and visual effects, users easily indulge into the virtual world. In fact, these people find it difficult to communicate to their friends and family members, they tend to spend less quality time for their families and other relationships, which is detrimental to their social circles.
In fact, technology is considered as a two-edged sword, it has both benefits and drawbacks. In terms of its benefit, the state-of-the-art technology can help people to have access to the latest information and broaden their network. For example, internet users can use Facebook, Zalo to make new friends around the world, which provide sentimental values for netizens. On the other hand, when people become abuse this tool, they are prone to get addicted into the internet world. As a result, they have a tendency to spend most of their leisure time on games and surfing the internet, which can lead to sedentary and isolated lifestyle and health deterioration.
In conclusion, the state-of-the-art technology can bring many merits to cooperation and interaction. By considering its pros and cons, we can have feasible activities to maximize advantages from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In recent decades, the question whether the proliferation of technology has goo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... still overshadow. There are a whole host of bad and good effects technology make...
^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rd, it has both benefits and drawbacks. In terms of its benefit, the state-of-the-...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43103448276 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06904494279 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596551724138 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3446139022 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142862157347 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528924462948 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349256674973 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849730220953 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285053978872 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.