Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is undeniable that technology plays a vital role in our modern world. In addition, it has significantly changed the way how people behave and make relationships with others. In my opinion, these changes have both negative and positive aspects, so let’s consider the most important ones.
Firstly, the basic principles of working altered for many citizens. One should note here that nowadays a lot of companies work online, so it can be considered as a positive feature for firms and workers. To be more specific, employers are able to recruit people all over the world and organise meeting online for free. Consequently, expenditures on office equipment and electricity are much less and business become more profitable and effective. For employees it means that they can stay at home and do their assignments remotely. Furthermore, foreigners have an opportunity to work in better conditions with a high salary.
Secondly, the way how people communicate completely changed in negative way. Basically, plenty of kids and adults use their mobile phones and computer to chat with other people. Despite the fact that it is the fastest way of communication, it has a detrimental effect on users. For instance, youngsters in schools become less communicative in real life, so lots of problems with parents, teachers and studying appear. As a result, because of poor communication abilities it would be quite difficult for such individuals to find a good job and make new friends.
To draw the conclusion, technological development brought new ways of interaction that have advantages and disadvantages for people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32558139535 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08730601755 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3222805948 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259700291759 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811190211392 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921703037685 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159432101626 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638426642429 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.