The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram depicts the main principle of producing energy by using a wave-energy machine as well as its possible locations.
Overall, the machine itself consists of 2 chambers and turbine which rotates, while location options include only 2 variants with different pros and cons.
According to the data, the main idea stands on water and air interaction. When a wave comes into the lower chamber of the machine, a water level increases within this section, so it forces air to flow through holes into the upper chamber. In this section the turbine attached to an electricity generator, so when the air flow comes through it, the turbine rotates and the generator produce electricity. In addition, the turbine also intakes outside air and convey it into the lower chamber.
Building variants include installation near the coast and construction far in the sea. The first option means that installation costs will be low as well as electricity output due to small waves. The installation method into a deep water requires high installation costs, but because of large waves the output will be high.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 226, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'deep water'.
Suggestion: deep water
...all waves. The installation method into a deep water requires high installation costs, but b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14917127072 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69904063802 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6598632371 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963849952848 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439715496918 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750632527007 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823219633214 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985260229945 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.