There is no doubt that nowadays there are a great number of different ways to get knowledge. However, some people believe that higher education should be available only to successful students while others are sure that access to colleges and universities should be provided to everybody, so I am going to discuss these views in the following essay.
Firstly, I think that free education in universities can lead to several social problems. The most obvious one, is that there will be an enormous amount of newcomers every year. For teachers it means that they will have to do plenty of work while for students there will be a small chance to answer or take part in a conversation. As a result, the quality of education will be poor, so students won’t be able to become good specialists in the future. In addition, the government will be supposed to spend most of the money on education field to pay salaries and, consequently, serious problems in other fields such as healthcare may appear. Despite these drawbacks, this way can provide opportunities for students from rural areas to get vital knowledge about future specialities.
Secondly, The other method will be able to push science to higher results. In case when only good students will be able to study at universities, a high quality of knowledge can be provided. Moreover, this way implies that teens will be interested in their major fields, so a lot of detailed and accurate researches will be done at the end of education. What is more, a competitive aspect of life will be very important, because it teaches other individuals how to do their work good and overcome possible difficulties. Thus, young specialists with vital knowledge will be able to rile factories and organise a work process very effectively, so great outcomes will be provided.
To draw the conclusion, I am of the opinion that higher education should be provided for good students, because in long-term perspective it will allow to build a highly developed society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
... in long-term perspective it will allow to build a highly developed society.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, i think, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97922848665 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86060492174 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548961424332 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0155693287 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308480495695 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110338370647 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108927613317 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220246048262 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102205046985 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.