The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.

The charts represent the percentages of salaries spent on different social needs in one mounth by low income group and high income group in an European country.

Overall, the level of expenses on some items such as clothing are similar for both groups, whilst other needs such as food and cultural activities contribute differently.

According to the data, people of low income group spend 29% of monthly income on food and drink which is the biggest part of expenditures. Fuel and miscellaneous have 24% and 18% respectively. Recreational and cultural activities take 11% of income every month, while 9% of money is used on transportation. In addition, people spend about 5% on clothing and 4% restaurant and hotel.

On the other hand, 5% of monthly income is spent on clothing and 7% on fuel. Citizens from high income group also use 12% on restaurant & hotel and 15% on food and drink. Relatively high expenses contribute to recreational activities that have 21% and miscellaneous, on which 23% of monthly income is spent.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...w income group and high income group in an European country. Overall, the le...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08187134503 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92794184179 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6206622879 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203846758978 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852745624443 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882491182918 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137834543412 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104029077486 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.