The chart shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain.
The bar chart gives data regarding expenditure on fast foods spent weekly by three largely income groups in Britain.
Overall, there is a significant positive relationship between income and consumed hamburgers among British people, indicating that the higher levels of income earned, the more hamburgers consumed. However, this relationship is not strong, but still significant for the portion of pizza consumed each week.
It is clear that among three different fast foods, hamburgers are interested in British people that are in high and average-income groups, spending on which more than 40 and 30 pence each week. By contrast, just 14 pence spent on hamburgers by people with low income. Similarly, the high-income group spent 19 pence on buying pizza, followed by average-group with 10 and then low-income one with just 6 pence.
However, it seems that the above trend is not reflected in consuming fish and chips by groups. While average-income people use the high rate of fish and chips spending just under 25 pence per week, fish and chips appear not to be their favorite fast food, spending 18 pence, which is similar in low-income people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is similar in low-income people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, similarly, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24598930481 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75725368481 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604278074866 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2367830877 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166268503333 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814215645025 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100421763122 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131853971262 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117240314575 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.