The chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98.
The table gives data regarding the outcomes of a survey in which 100,000 UK residents participated as to how many of them visited abroad and why between the years 1994 and 1998.
Overall, there was a growth in the number of people visited abroad for different reasons during the five years, except for the year 1995, in which the number declined slightly. The main purpose of travelers was for holiday, followed by business. In addition, the purpose of holiday included the most increased number of people from 1994 to 1998.
In 1994, approximately one-fifth (22,072) of British citizens traveled to a foreign country, While the figures show that there was a slight reduction in 1995, falling to 21,610, the trend was upward for the next three years, reaching 28,828 in 1998.
Regarding the purposes of visiting abroad, we see that the holiday was the most frequent reason for British people taking a trip to foreign countries for five years, from 15,246 in 1994 to 20,700 in 1998. After that, business took the second place reason going to abroad, fluctuating about 3,000 people each year during the period, followed by the purpose of visiting friends and acquaintances, reaching 3,181 individuals in 1998. Finally, 1000 UK residents that fluctuated during the period decided to take a trip for other reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, second, so, while, as for, as to, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0871559633 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49585128366 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536697247706 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0158790808 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.625 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211898814028 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984250486274 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330456643349 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133588188847 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288023034402 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.