Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city, most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers. Consequently, they are against living in the city.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
City life issues in the world today are widely debated, with some claiming that they cause physical and social threats for city dwellers who are not satisfied with living in a city. However, I personally do not entirely accept this, and I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, we have to consider the potential positives of city living. Major cities around the world are a place where big events such as sporting events, concerts, festivals, and art openings are held. In Iran, for example, almost all football national team matches are held in the Azadi stadium which is located in the cosmopolitan city called Tehran. Such events can make a considerable contribution to urban residents' experiencing positive emotions. Furthermore, there are numerous infrastructures, facilities, and amenities in big cities, including shopping centers and public transport systems which in turn provide residents with convenience and comfort. In these cases, city life actually leads to a comfortable and lavish lifestyle.
A further reason to be against this idea is the economic aspect. Although most cities are overpopulated and the roads are heavily congested, yet we do not have to deny that these are characteristics of metropolises that can help the economic dynamics of cities. The more people living in a city, the more job opportunities, labor force, and highly paid jobs are available. Take New York City which has the largest population and is the most crowded city among other cities in the US and other international cities as an example. In this city, not only the standard of living but also the quality of life of people is highly considerable. Therefore, one of the main advantages of living in a city is to make a lot of money.
This s not to say life city is entirely good. There are drawbacks in terms of air pollution, lack of parking as well as the cost of living. But to say that it is always a force for good is to ignore the various problems it causes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93413173653 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82496572596 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565868263473 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5402307642 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155465251414 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485605849611 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549186352276 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100211091568 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082430637307 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.