The chart shows british emigration to selected destination between 2004 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant .
The given layout reveals information about servay by international passenger of british emigration to selected the different countries during the years 2004 to 2007.The data is calibrated in thousands which is clear and coherant representation .
It can be seen that the people gone to Austraila in year 2004 from 42 thousands together with 9 thousands people had walked in same country in the year 2005 and 53 thousands pupil removed in 2006 year then , 45 thousands the individuals was going in the year 2007 Apart from all this the mankind moved to spain during the year 2004 ,2005,2006 and 2007 was 35,36,33 and 27 thousands respectively.
As for as trend was concerned the people had to go in U.S.A with 25 thousands in the year 2004 and the 19 thousands people had been gone in the year 2005 together with 26 thousands humankind was being moved in the year 2006. In this addition to this the pupil had to walk in year 2007.Moreover, people moved to France during the year 2004,2005,2006 and 2007 was 23,35,27 and 18 thousands respectively.
Overall,It is evident that the humankind was more moved in year 2004 and then slightly decreased in the country Newzealand during the year 2005 and 2007.
Comments
read the waring messages like
read the waring messages like:
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482926829268 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given layout reveals information about s...
^^
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation about servay by international passenger of british emigration to selec...
^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...countries during the years 2004 to 2007.The data is calibrated in thousands which ...
^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries during the years 2004 to 2007.The data is calibrated in thousands which is...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ich is clear and coherant representation . It can be seen that the people gone...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is clear and coherant representation . It can be seen that the people gone to A...
^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...housands pupil removed in 2006 year then , 45 thousands the individuals was going ...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...kind moved to spain during the year 2004 ,2005,2006 and 2007 was 35,36,33 and 27 t...
^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...s concerned the people had to go in U.S.A with 25 thousands in the year 2004 and ...
^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...this the pupil had to walk in year 2007.Moreover, people moved to France during the year...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , It
...nd 18 thousands respectively. Overall,It is evident that the humankind was more ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, apart from, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89268292683 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82214101665 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482926829268 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8608272408 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.6 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087712836593 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722079691025 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587971079635 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809486252335 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604847376196 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 13.2329268293 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.