The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2005. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The vertical bar graph depicts the information about the international passenger survey British emigration to five selected countries over the given period 2004 and 2007. It is calibrated in thousands. It is clear and coherent representation
It is clearly seen that, in the year 2004, the Australia was 41 thousand, and In Newzealand, France and USA destinations almost similar passengers that was 23 thousands. Apart from this, the Australia passengers had been 39 thousand, 52 thousand, 44 thousand that was in the year 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Moreover, the Spain which had equal number of passengers in the year of 2004 and 2005, the figure for that was 35 thousand.
Moving Further, the Newzealand, which had constant British emigration in all years. Further more, in 2005, the international passenger was only 22 thousand in USA. and In 2007, which had been approximately 10 thousand. Moreover, the same trend in France like USA.
Overall, it is evident that, the maximim international passenger had been moved in Australia whereas other destination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtical bar graph depicts the information about the international passenger surv...
^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bar graph depicts the information about the international passenger survey Brit...
^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion about the international passenger survey British emigration to five select...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is clear and coherent representation It is clearly seen that, in the year 2004,...
^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... passenger was only 22 thousand in USA. and In 2007, which had been approximately 1...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34705882353 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04001570748 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.864926385 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103016317452 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420872770557 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531340352502 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063306346917 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520542201884 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.