The chart shows the change in forested land in different regions of the world over time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart depicts the changes in forested areas in major regions of the world during the 15-year period (1995-2010). Overall, three main trends were seen in this chart: the decline trends occurring in Central and North Africa, Central and South America, and South Asia; the rise in Central and East Asia and the Caribbean; and the maintenance in North America and Europe.
Among the first group of decreasing forested areas, Central America witnessed the most drastic changes since it reached the lowest rate of the whole period from 1995 to 2000 (roughly minus 1.5%) before fluctuating 10 years later. Meanwhile, the rate of forested area in North Africa was recorded at almost minus 0.6% at the first stage of the period, before climbing to approximately minus 0% afterward.
East Asia saw the greatest increasing forested cover, rising from 0.7% to 1.25% from 1995 to 2005. Moving to Central Asia, the rising trend also occurred, although the proportion was not as much, from about 0.1% to 0.4% during the period. North America remained its percentage of forested land with very small percentages, while the percentage in Europe appeared to be a little higher in comparison to it (around 0.2%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to approximately minus 0% afterward. East Asia saw the greatest increasing fo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03015075377 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44124926778 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0021551324 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.833333333 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107220355316 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609112642648 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541138688126 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073033719347 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299498920295 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.