Cause and effect of the popularity of fast food restaurants (pt.1)
Lifestyle of modern people hass been rapidly changing which can be clearly reflected in the daily diet. For example, fast food and the popularity of its restaurants have been playing an essential part of people’s life. Due to modern lifestyle and the actual and fierce competition among many fastfood manufacturers, the expansion of junk food chain stores has been strongly influencing our health and lifestyle.
The cutting-edge way of life is an actual factor from the popularity of convenience food. People nowadays are getting busier than before, and as the result, they have lesser time to prepare such a meal. Consequently, people come to the junk food restaurants as an inevitable solution of daily meals. In additions, the rivalry among fastfood brands also contributes to the developments of fastfood restaurants. “Profit is above all” motivates powerfully business to single out the most effective stategies. It leads to an obvious result that cheaper is the price, and better is quality of service, that leads to many people can consume fastfood as an alternative for traditional meals.
However, indeniably, fastfood expansion has already caused many serious diseases for people. Obesity, blood pressure and diabetes are typical result of fastfood which contains too much salt and saturated fat. The expansion has also been attering people’s habits. Instead of building a healthy eating habit, people choose an easy way to satistfy hunger with fastfood. Moreover, following the domino effect, sedentary lifestyle and lack of activity cause many potential harms for health.
All things considered, the development of junkfood chain stores caused from modern routines and the drastic competition among fastfood brands obviously change people’s health and lifestyle. People should adjust daily diet to be healthier in their personal schedule.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can consume fastfood as an alternative for traditional meals. However, indenia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54385964912 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80043966121 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0501314058 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157390714874 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522422657674 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695897249296 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906424144538 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041162362236 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.