Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Many people believe that more and more young people have been using social networking sites as an optimal alternative to conventional socialization. In this essay, I will share my opinion about the cause of this phenomenon and the actions to help them build more communication skills in real life.
The first and foremost reason why many young adults find it irresistible when using and diving into some social networking sites is because these flatforms are incredibly easy to use. Creating an account on some of the most popular platforms, like Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram, does not take more than 1 minute. Users can find, add friends to, converse with, and start a relationship with anyone they want, even strangers. Furthermore, the first reason can cause the second one, which is even more serious, that the number of people socializing on virtual platforms as an optimal way to escape real communication has increased unstoppably. When every step of a relationship can be done on social networking sites, there will be nothing to stop young people from finding and building relationships on them, even if they are fake.
It seems to be hard to find an absolute solution to this phenomenon since it has become a bigger and bigger part of life. Yet we can help young people get back to real communication by holding some practical activities for them, such as camping, outdoor games, and playful activities. Offline meetings could be effective for teenagers because at these events they are able to meet, interact with one another, and learn some social skills in parallel.
In conclusion, socializing online should be considered as a means of communicating, not a thing to boycott. It would be much better for teenagers to learn to balance relationships on virtual platforms and in real life at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...find, add friends to, converse with, and start a relationship with anyone they wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01650165017 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84297333063 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1493908703 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144555730073 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546178924019 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502715794256 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937309281293 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258807308035 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.