The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps describe the change of an island, before and after the refurbishment for tourism.
As can be seen in the maps, the sea-isolated island was stranded without any residential buildings. However, two circular groups of hunts were soon built there, and they are properly connected one by one by a system of footpaths. There was also a small beach nearby, but now it is planned and constructed so that a swimming service can develop.
In the midst of the island, the area was totally empty. However, a huge restaurant and a reception have been built there, well connected with one another by the vehicle track. The track also leads to a recently-constructed pier, which allows tourists to enjoy the yatch service.
Overall, the number of accommodation has noticeably increased, along with the new tourism services attached to it. However, the rest of the island has yet to be exploited for some unknown reasons. Therefore, a well-designed scheme to improve this area should be on the lookout.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (6 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
... there, and they are properly connected one by one by a system of footpaths. There was also a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, therefore, well, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119760479 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10099867207 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664670658683 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1304311311 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130819060267 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559328454315 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720543198548 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977663577857 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856033679677 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.