The table and chart shows data from a survey of library users.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two charts give information about research on people using libraries in 2012. Overall, the charts have shown three main groups of users as well as their purposes for using libraries.
In the table, the youngest users, aged from 16 to 17, contributed to having used the library at a rate of 72%, which can be seen as the highest rate of the two others. In addition, roughly 43% of this group also got help from librarians, in comparison to about 27% of users aged 18 to 24 years old. Also, 74% of the oldest users of this survey think that the library is crucial, while just over half of the youngest group think so.
The rates of library use also illustrate the differences among the three groups. About 55% of teenage users used libraries for research and a half for borrowing books. Meanwhile, just roughly 45% and 38% of the middle group use libraries for research and book-borrowing, respectively. The oldest group seems to be the least active since just under one-third of them went to libraries to borrow newspapers, as their rates in the two categories seemed slightly lower.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70157068063 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54336044001 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3191268702 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150692430144 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700294179226 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033334041661 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115125310654 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373903679122 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.