The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the information around five most popular brands mobile phone were sold worldwide in 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that Nokia was the most popular brand in two years. But after that, Samsung became a market leader. Furthermore, Samsung and Apple were a big development on sales during the period shown on the chart.
In 2009, the number of mobile phones were sold by Nokia reached a peak of 430 million, which was most double than that of Samsung. Over following four years, the amount of mobile phones of Samsung became the most popular brand in the world with nearly 450 units. By contrast, Nokia's sales figures had a big drop into 220 million.
Turning to the other remaining vendors, in 2009, Apple had the lowest number of handset sold, compared with LG and ZTE. But this figure over taken both brands in 2011 with the amount nearly 100 million and it continuously went into 150 millions mobile phones in 2013. Similarly, ZTE had a slight increase while the trend of LG went down gradually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Komalpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Mohamed talaat | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Qanh03 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-04 | Sukeerty | 56 | view |
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise th 66
- The graph below shows US consumers'average annual expenditures on cell phone and residental phone services between 2000 and 2011. 56
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese island 73
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and ZTE. But this figure over taken both brands in 2011 with the amount nearly 10...
^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le the trend of LG went down gradually.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72928176796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24996905174 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.507845207 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24904492661 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945273776589 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914611812697 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172950982344 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939496476353 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.