The given chart gives information about the frequency of eating at fast food establishments in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the majority of Americans ate in fast food once a week or once a month in all three years.
At first, in 2003, eating once a week and once or twice a month had the most frequency at about 60%. Then, between 2003 and 2006, the total proportion of people who consumed fast food either once a week or several times a week in restaurant declined by about 8%. However, the frequency of having fast food once or twice a month experience a boom over the mentioned period and peaked at 34% which was the maximum reported number of the chart.
Moreover, people who never ate and ate daily had the least share (9%) in 2003. Following this, they experience a small fall of about 2% in 2006 and then remained stable. Conversely, a few times a year figure rose up gradually by nearly 2% in 2006 and did not change in the following 7 years.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence:It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than to learn facts 70
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 84
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 56
- Students leave high school without a good understanding of how to manage money. What do you think are the reasons? And give some possible solutions for this problem. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43820224719 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42295757155 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9763172595 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267537367503 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117269855347 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973195424517 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16727978215 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692669402396 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.