The provided chart compares average amount of CO2 which was emitted in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, United Kingdom produced the highest amount of CO2 in the mentioned period.
At first, in 1967, United Kingdom CO2 production was about 11 metric tons per person which was the maximum reported number in these 4 figures. Afterwards, this amount remained stable in the first 10 years which was followed by a small fall in the following 30 years. However, the volume of CO2 emission in Portugal originally was roughly 1 as it was the least number compared to other countries. Then, it saw a considerably growth in the given period.
Moreover, Sweden had an upward trend and it made a peaked at just above 10 metric tons in 1977. After this, there was a reduction in CO2 production over the next 30 years so that Sweden and Portugal had the same amount of CO2 emission in 2007. Conversely, the CO2 amount which was produced by Italy approximately doubled between 1967 and 1997. Following this, there was a period of steadiness.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. 64
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 77
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...mpared to other countries. Then, it saw a considerably growth in the given period. Moreover, Swede...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 937.175257732 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85326086957 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53439827611 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 290.88556701 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1211412847 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 76.5299724578 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 16.8248392259 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 4.34317383033 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186390771677 0.216113520407 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806733082643 0.0766984524023 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733828063661 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136238390551 0.12726935374 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597103159459 0.0580467560999 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.